65 Madison Ave · Suite 420 · Morristown, NJ · 07960

¡Attention TAC People!

Press 'p' on your keyboard to make this palette go away.

Max width: 1200px
Color Hex R G B
Blue from Logo#003d65 0 61 101
Darker Blue#021020 2 16 32
Red from Logo#780500 120 5 0
Darker Red#400000 64 0 0
Gray from Modern Firm Site#f3f2ed 243 242 237
Bright, Light Blue#ccebff 204 235 255
Form Input Background Blue#accfe6 172 207 230
Slightly Darker Blue#002e4d 0 46 77
Slightly Darker Gray#e6e5e0 0 46 77
Darker Gray#cccbc7 0 46 77
Lighter Logo Blue#005c99 204 235 255
Login Link Blue#598fb3 89 143 179
Slighty Lighter Red#99150f 153 21 15
Slighty Darker Gray#b3b2ae 179 178 174
Hunter Green#013b23 1 59 35
Lighter Green #025935 ? ? ?
Beige Charcoal #1f1e1e ? ? ?
"Metallic Gold" #D4AF37 ? ? ?
"Darker Green" #012e1b ? ? ?

Mans Genius Argument Proves Less Than Genius In Divorce Case

When it comes to divorce and the occasional tendency for things to get messy, much of that drama stems from the root of many disputes in all aspects of life: money.

An out-of-state family law case presents a husband’s bold attempt at trying to get out of his divorce with more than the half that the state would generally give him through division of property. Why did he think he deserved more than the standard spouse would get through property division? Well, because he is a “genius.”

According to a New York Times blog, the husband in this unique divorce dispute is an incredibly successful New York financier and overall businessman. (We will not include the names of the involved spouses in this case for the sake of privacy.) He argues that he is owed the majority of the family’s estimated $450 million worth of assets because his personal qualities are what earned the money.

The husband and his divorce attorney worked so hard on that argument that they brought in various psychologists to testify to the rare strengths of the husband’s intellectual qualities. While the judge ultimately didn’t deny that the husband is a talented, gifted man, she ruled that those realities didn’t matter. The wife is still owed an equal amount of assets.

Family courts don’t just look at what each partner literally earned financially during the marriage. The judge supported her ruling based on the system’s rule of looking at what each partner brought to the marriage, the household and family overall. Though the wife in this case didn’t work outside of the home and earn money, her work in the home, with the couple’s child and support of her husband’s work make her a reasonable force behind the couple’s earning potential.

What do you think about this case? Does the husband have a point, or do you think he was out of line in requesting more money out of the marriage because of his “genius?”


The New York Times, (blog): “In Divorce Case, Judge Refuses to Hear Evidence of ‘Genius,’” Peter Lattman, Aug. 4, 2011

Begin Your Conversation

  • Disclaimer: Contacting our firm via the internet does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information through this form.

Contact Our Morris County Office



Morristown / Morris County Law Office

65 Madison Ave

Suite 420

Morristown, NJ 07960

Morris County Mediation Office Map