65 Madison Ave · Suite 420 · Morristown, NJ · 07960

¡Attention TAC People!

Press 'p' on your keyboard to make this palette go away.

Max width: 1200px
Color Hex R G B
Blue from Logo#003d65 0 61 101
Darker Blue#021020 2 16 32
Red from Logo#780500 120 5 0
Darker Red#400000 64 0 0
Gray from Modern Firm Site#f3f2ed 243 242 237
Bright, Light Blue#ccebff 204 235 255
Form Input Background Blue#accfe6 172 207 230
Slightly Darker Blue#002e4d 0 46 77
Slightly Darker Gray#e6e5e0 0 46 77
Darker Gray#cccbc7 0 46 77
Lighter Logo Blue#005c99 204 235 255
Login Link Blue#598fb3 89 143 179
Slighty Lighter Red#99150f 153 21 15
Slighty Darker Gray#b3b2ae 179 178 174
Hunter Green#013b23 1 59 35
Lighter Green #025935 ? ? ?
Beige Charcoal #1f1e1e ? ? ?
"Metallic Gold" #D4AF37 ? ? ?
"Darker Green" #012e1b ? ? ?

Applying To The Court For A Name Change

In the exercise of its “original jurisdiction” as per R. 2:10-5, the Chancery Division, Family Part, has the authority to order a change in both a child’s last name and first name. 

Pursuant to Gubernat v. Deremer, 140 N.J. 120 (1995), the Supreme Court of New Jersey enumerated a list of factors that are to be considered by the trial court in making a determination upon application by a parent.

The factors include the length of time that the child has used one surname, the identification of the child as a member or part of a family unit, the potential anxiety associated with a potential name change, including embarassment or discomfort the child might experience if the child bears a surname different from the custodial parent, and any preferences the child might express, assuming the child possesses sufficient maturity to express a relevant preference.  See Gubernat.

The Appellate Division affirmed this holding in the subsequent case of Staradumsky v. Romanowski, 300 N.J. Super. 618 (App. Div. 1997), wherein a father, the Defendant Stephen Romanowski, appealed from a trial court order granting the Plaintiff mother’s application to change the first, middle, and last name of a child born to the couple. 

The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s decision, holding that the name change was justified based upon the fact that the Plaintiff mother was the primary residential parent with “principal custody” of the child.  The Appellate Division, however, kept the father’s preferred middle name as a means to honor the “heritage” of the father’s family.

Gubernat and Staradumsky remain the seminal cases on the issue of applications for a name change.

by Robert H. Siegel, Esq.

Begin Your Conversation

  • Disclaimer: Contacting our firm via the internet does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information through this form.

Contact Our Morris County Office



Morristown / Morris County Law Office

65 Madison Ave

Suite 420

Morristown, NJ 07960

Morris County Mediation Office Map